American Imperialism Characteristics - 903 Words

American Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century extended from several characteristics of America and American society, including but not limited to exceptionalism and manifest destiny. While these beliefs not only supported and manifested the perpetual effort to exploit and later completely oppress and subjugate the Native American populations within its borders, they also supported the later establishment of reservations and the practice of Native American boarding school education. But, American Imperialism extended far beyond its ever-expanding territory (Yale, 2008, Avalon Project). Rather, evidence existed in many corners of the world, like Asia, Southeast Asia, and Cuba. American Imperialism informed numerous unequal†¦show more content†¦Moreover, it more accurately made America the oppressor and therefore deemed its founding documents and the beliefs therein invalid (Halsell, 1997, p. 1). In fact, Halsell (1997) articulates that American Imperialism is contrary to â⠂¬Å"the spirit of 1776† (p.1). Americans began increasingly questioning the American government’s actions and policies regarding the aforementioned reasons. Subjugating people in the Philippines, in China before, during and after the Opium Wars and in both the Hawaiian Islands and the Aleutian Islands clearly violated the most sacred American beliefs. More importantly, these actions violated the very principles upon which America was founded, the principles that cohesively held a nation together. For these reasons, this inspired debate and divisions among the American people and among government officials and representatives. Yet, America essentially picked up where other Colonial countries left off. For example, it assumed Spain’s role after its victory in the Spanish American war. Accordingly, it continued Spain’s military suppression of the people in the Philippines. While Halsell (1997) clearly states that many Americans counter-argued these actions co ntending that the Filipinos deserved freedom, American military efforts persisted from 1861 until 1899 (p. 1). Culminating in the ultimate oppression and subjugation of the Filipino population, American Imperialism deniedShow MoreRelatedImperialism Essay771 Words   |  4 PagesImperialism could be considered as a defining characteristic of America in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Imperialism is defined as â€Å"a policy of extending a countrys power and influence through diplomacy or military force† (Imperialism and Immigration). When it comes to imperialism in America, I must say that other factors were more influential than social Darwinism. Although I do agree to a certain extent that social Darwinism did play a big role, things such as expansionist objectivesRead MoreWas Manifest Destiny, An Ideology Coined By John L. O Sullivan Essay1100 Words   |  5 PagesWas Manifest Destiny a benevolent movement or in fact was it early imperialism pursued at the expens e of others? The Manifest Destiny, an ideology coined by John L. O’Sullivan, described the attitude of American’s in the 19th century in regards to the expansion of the United States. There are disagreements on whether this expansion was a benevolent movement or an act of early imperialism. Some think because the 19th century Americans saw the expansion as a task given by God that was based on goodRead MoreWestern Imperialism and Modern East Asia Essay example1188 Words   |  5 PagesWestern imperialism in East Asia caused many tribulations for China, Japan, and Korea but also helped them to become contemporary nations. The East Asian countries were tremendously affected by unequal treaties, extraterritoriality, and above all, technology. Great Britain encroached upon China their greed for open trade with the Chinese empire resulting in the deterioration of the Chinese culture, which led to the emergence of a modernized civilization. Japan was co-subjugated by Russia and theRe ad MoreIs There Any Good to Imperialism?1114 Words   |  4 Pagesany good to Imperialism? â€Å"Monopolies, oligarchy, the striving for domination and not for freedom, the exploitation of an increasing number of small or weak nations by a handful of the richest or most powerful nations. All these have given birth to those distinctive characteristics of imperialism which compel us to define it as parasitic or decaying capitalism.† (Ulyanov, P.286) Very strong words are used when talking about imperialism. Some people believe they know what imperialism is, but manyRead MoreDifference Between Formal And Informal Imperialism1721 Words   |  7 PagesDIFFERENCE BETWEEN FORMAL AND INFORMAL IMPERIALISM Name University Course Tutor Date Difference between formal and informal imperialism Throughout the history of the world, different kingdoms have been competing to expand their territories. In most cases, the expansion of theses territories has been at the expense of weaker territories that are incapable of fighting back effectively owing to different barriers . For example, the Mongols expanded their territory in less than a hundred yearsRead MoreUnderstanding the Convergence of Media Systems and Political Communication in the U.S. and Western Europe1054 Words   |  5 Pageschanges as causally prior to media system change. Americanization and Globalization The phenomenon of homogenization in world media systems was first emphasized as a scholarly issue in the cultural imperialism literature of the 1960s and 1970s. Cultural imperialism theory was obviously a theory of external influence (e.g. Schiller, 1969, 1976; Boyd-Barret, 1977). It saw homogenization as a result of cultural domination. The global expansion of mass media industriesRead MoreImperialism is Almost Never Acceptable1629 Words   |  6 Pagesthrough imperialism or the act of conquering another country, taking over and using that country for support of the mother country for things such as natural resources, cheap labor and economic benefits such as international seaports. Imperialism was the empowerment of another country such as Great Britain over India. Imperialism was a type of social darwinism where the country that imperialized the most places was to be the strongest, fittest, and most likely to survive. Reasons for imperialism varyRead MoreThe Crystal Frontier By Carlos Fuentes1438 Words   |  6 PagesCrystal Frontier, Carlos Fuentes presents two of his main characters in much a similar fashion; in Spoils, we find Dionisio is a world-renowned chef and cuisine connoisseur, and also a fervent critic of American cuisine and culture. Dionisio believes that through his country’s chromosomal imperialism, Mexico will be able to solidify its sphere of influence in America; however, when he travels to the United States, he indulges in the same institutions that he ridicules when he lives in Mexico. SimilarlyRead MoreIn his 1974 speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Yasser Arafat said: â€Å"The difference between the1600 Words   |  7 Pagesother words, Arafat here means the â€Å"furtherance of their rightful causes and the attainment of their right to self-determination.† In toto, then, Arafat predictably equivocates that the â€Å"developing† world is â€Å"gripped by armed struggles provoked by imperialism and racial discrimination† which are â€Å"merely forms of aggression and terror.† This, then is the seedbed of his argument; realpolitik (in terms of maximizing national competence) is not only outmoded, it is morally wrong-instead, nations that haveRead MoreThe widespread image of American culture is seen to hold a strong base for gl obalisation. The1000 Words   |  4 PagesThe widespread image of American culture is seen to hold a strong base for globalisation. The extensive connectivity of the modern world, confirms Marshal McLuhans prediction of the global village. Globalisation is commonly seen as western culture imputing international cultures. Internet and television have also created transnational media whereas globalisation is commonly seen as a flow of information impending of western culture. Whereas, how will the younger generation will not be able to enjoy

Modern Nco Maintaining a Marine’s Heritage Free Essays

Since the Marine Corps’ beginnings, non-commissioned officers (NCOs) have played an important role in the many successes in the Corps and in the United States. Obviously, the modern NCO today might be a bit different than when the Marine Corps was first established on November 10, 1775, but they uphold and are the complete embodiment of the Corp’s history and traditions in values of honor, courage, and the commitment to the NCO creed. Honor guides the Marines to exemplify the ultimate in ethical and moral behavior, and to respect others as well as themselves. We will write a custom essay sample on Modern Nco: Maintaining a Marine’s Heritage or any similar topic only for you Order Now In the Marine Corps, practically every custom, both written and unwritten, has stemmed from the conduct of past Marines. It is only appropriate that our Marines today recognize this and dutifully portray this in their everyday as well as in combat. On every battlefield that our country has been on since the founding of the Corps, Marines have been there to defeat all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Within these battlefields, there have been NCOs that have fought, led, and died in combat—to complete their mission and to protect their fellow Marines fighting alongside them. An NCO must always keep in mind mission accomplishment and the welfare of their men and woman. This needs to be displayed in the workplace as well. It is the responsibility of NCOs to make sure that their junior marines know what it is to honorably be â€Å"a Marine†. This means that their conduct as a Marine is to be carried on to an NCOs civilian side as well. Having courage doesn’t mean that you can’t be scared; it means you push forward in the midst of fear. Along with carrying the honor of being a Marine, modern NCOs carry the courage one needs to be successful in both combat and as a civilian. There have been many in the corps who have displayed courageous acts. It is the duty of an NCO, as well as all Marines, to have the courage, that inner strength to do what it right and adhere to a higher standard of conduct, and to make tough decisions under hard stress and pressure. It is said in the first line of the NCO creed that an NCO is â€Å"dedicated to training new Marines and influencing the old. † Dedicated. Dedication is what makes the Corps so unique. The modern Marine NCO is supposed to be dedicated. Dedicated to the work that he or she does on a daily basis. Dedicated to the life he leads for his or her junior marines. Dedicated to themselves, having personal integrity in all that they do. To close, The most outstanding custom in the Marine Corps is simply â€Å"being a Marine† and all that it implies. Call it morale, call it what you will—it is that pride which sets a United States Marine apart from the men of other armed services. It is not taught in manuals, yet it is the most impressive lesson a recruit learns in boot camp. It is not tangible, yet it has won fights against material odds. Senator Paul H. Douglas said it best: â€Å"Those of us who have had the privilege of serving in the Marine Corps value our experience as among the most precious of our lives. The fellowship of shared hardships and dangers in a worthy cause creates a close bond of comradeship. It is the basic reason for the cohesiveness of Marines and for the pride we have in our corps and our loyalty to each other. † An NCO is proud of his Corps and believes it to be second to none. He is carries the honor of the Corp’s heritage, courageous, and loyal to his comrades and to the Marine Corps, adhering always to the motto Semper Fidelis (Always Faithful). How to cite Modern Nco: Maintaining a Marine’s Heritage, Essay examples

Tyranny of the Majority free essay sample

After reading the memoir First They Killed My Father written by Loung Ung, I believe that majority rule is not an effective way of government and the majority of people should not be able to impose their views on all the citizens. Majority rule is not a good form of government because it oppresses the minority. This means that a group of people has power over another. The Khmer Rouge used scare tactics to become the majority. Even though people did not want to follow their cruel regime, they did so in fear of their lives. Pa referred to the Khmer Rouge soldiers as destroyers of things (Ung, pg. 6) and this was exactly what they were. They destroyed lives, families, and the Cambodian way of life. A majority rule type of government causes the minority to hate them, so how can this be an effective form of government? The water washes away the dirt, but it will never put out the fire of hate I have for the Khmer Rouge. We will write a custom essay sample on Tyranny of the Majority or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page (Ung, pg. 168) Loung Ung must follow the way of the Angkar, but she must not express how she truly feels in fear of her life. In Cambodia, she was not the only person who quietly conversed about the tyranny the Khmer Rouge represent. So after all of these negative examples we can conclude that majority rule is by far an ineffective way of government. People express themselves in many different ways. Whether its the way you dress or the way you act, these characteristics make up who you are as a person. Many people dislike rules, but imagine these rules consisted of technology being taken away or having to do hard labor day after day? These were the rules the Khmer Rouge implemented on the people of Cambodia. People should have the right to think, act, and dress how they like without any influence from others. In this village, we live by strict rules and regulations set for us by the Angkar. We expect you to follow every rule. One of our rules applies to how we dress. As you see, we wear the same clothes. Everyone wears his or her hair in the same style. By wearing the same thing, we rid ourselves of the corrupt Western creation of vanity. (Ung pg. 58) This was just one of many rules that the Khmer Rouge and thei r Angkar government made up. I believe that nobody has the right to tell someone how to dress so the majority should not possess the power to impose their views on the citizens. The crisis in Cambodia during the mid to late 1970s not only showed the negative effects of the majority rule, but how unsuccessful it really was. The Khmer Rouge justified their actions by saying that they were the people’s government and that the majority of people wanted the pure agrarian society that Pol Pot and the Angkar wished for. In the end we can conclude that the majority rule is an ineffective form of govern ent and nobody should have the right to impose their views over others.